Congratulations to the Central School District for taking one of the
most-effective means of preventing school massacres — making sure that
the classroom school doors have locks that can be locked from the
inside. The effectiveness of this measure was surely demonstrated in
Newtown where life and death depended on the turn of a key.Whilst the
preparation of ceramic and porcelain tiles
are similar. The teachers who locked their doors or, if that was
impossible, were locked in by the school custodian lived, along with
their students. Those unable to lock their doors died.Other companies
want a piece of that iPhone headset action
To
those who protest that fire codes prohibit locking classroom doors, it
isn’t true. The general requirement of fire codes is that fire exits be
openable from the inside to allow escape in a fire. Panic hardware that
allows fire exits to be opened from the inside, but not the outside,
have long been standard features of modern buildings, except apparently
schools.
Congratulations also to all legislators who support
reasonable restrictions on weapons, such as the proposed legislation
mandating more-secure storage of weapons. If there has been a boom in
sales of gun lockers (not display cases) to match the post-Newtown surge
in sales of assault weapons, I sure haven’t heard of it. This is
something that all owners of weapons should support without being
compelled, but don’t.
On the other hand, the most-persuasive evidence for greater restrictions on weapons comes,Site describes services including Plastic Mould.
not from the proponents of restrictions, but from the free-floating
fear and anxiety and the lack of empathy of many of the supporters of
unrestricted weapon possession. We see them in innumerable legions in
all media touting how necessary weapons are to protect their lives,
liberty and pursuit of happiness. Absent from their arguments is any
appreciation that the children of Newtown also had a right to life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
President Barack Obama’s
featuring a child at a press conference who wrote that he wanted to be
safe and happy goes to the heart of the issue. The NRA has it half right
— people kill people including children, and they do it most
effectively with military weapons designed for killing people en masse.
At
the time of the passage of the Bill of Rights, the people of a young
nation had just gained their independence by defeating a country that
had the greatest military in the world. At Concord in 1775, a
confrontation between British troops and Minutemen occurred when the
Minutemen received word that the British were after the people’s
gunpowder. After a skirmish, the British searched house to house for
individual “military stores.” The British were trying to confiscate and
control all military-type arms that the Minutemen could use to defend
their liberty.
The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to
the Constitution and was passed because most people believed the
Constitution would not restrain the central government from abridging
individual rights. The Bill of Rights would stop a centralized
government from encroaching on the inalienable rights of the people.
Therefore, the Bill of Rights was adopted to protect the people from an
oppressive central government. When debating the formation of the
Constitution and the first 10 amendments, the framers wanted to protect
the people’s rights from being infringed again by an all-powerful
centralized government. The second of those amendments was adopted to
defend their newly gained freedoms.
When the Second Amendment
states in part “arms shall not be infringed,” the arms refer to military
arms. The framers wanted the people to have access to military arms
like the British to defend individual fundamental rights. The Second
Amendment to the Bill of Rights protects the people’s unalienable right —
not a right granted by the Constitution or by government. The original
purpose of the Second Amendment was to stop Congress from making laws
that allowed any infringement upon the right of the people to keep and
bear military-style arms.
A Clemson's men track athlete ran in
five indoor meets after his eligibility was complete and a women's track
team member received impermissible school expenses from former program
director Lawrence Johnson while training for a foreign Olympic team.
The
violations were outlined in the school's report sent to the NCAA last
month. The report was obtained by The Associated Press through a Freedom
of Information Act Request. Other violations include a Clemson runner
receiving shoes from a volunteer assistant and a prospect getting
bottled water on a recruiting visit last fall. Names of the athletes
were redacted in the documents.
The school's letter to the NCAA
said Johnson did not promote "an atmosphere of compliance" in the men's
and women's track programs. He was resigned as director on Jan. 8.
Johnson did not return emails left by the AP.
School spokeswoman
Libby Kehn said athletic director Dan Radakovich and other school
representatives would not comment on the violations until the NCAA
completes its investigation.
Clemson blacked-out the names of
those athletes involved in the report released to the AP. Clemson
classified the violations as secondary in nature, the less serious
category of NCAA transgressions.
The school told the NCAA it
received an anonymous letter last September about track and field
violations and hired an outside law firm, Bond, Schnoeneck & King,
to conduct an independent review of the program.
The inquiry
found Clemson used the ineligible athlete during the 2012 indoor season,
including at the Atlantic Coast Conference championships. The school
said as punishment, it would dock itself one track scholarship for the
2014-15 and 2015-16 seasons. It also agreed to pay a $2,500 fine and
revamp some procedures for tracking an athlete's eligibility.Did you
know that custom keychain chains can be used for more than just business.
A
second violation involved an athlete who competed for a foreign Olympic
team in London, yet received funds from Johnson while training with her
college teammates competing at the U.S. Olympic Trials in Eugene, Ore.,
last year. The school said it repaid the cost of the transportation
expenses, $175.60, to a Clemson area children's shelter.Application can
be conducted with the local designated IC card producers. The athlete missed the first two indoor meets of the season before here eligibility was restored by the NCAA.
Another
member of the women's team was found to have received a pair of Adidas
running shoes, valued at $95, from volunteer assistant Kristi Castlin.
The athlete was declared ineligible by the school and has not practiced
with the team since the spring semester began.
All the
violations, Clemson associate athletic director compliance services
Stephanie Ellison wrote the NCAA, show that Johnson "failed to promote
an atmosphere of compliance within his men's and women's track and field
program."
没有评论:
发表评论