Law firm MinterEllison has warned the Australian resources sector that it potentially risked the loss of ownership of key assets, including ore piles, unless it complied with new property-focused federal legislation, which would come into effect within three months.
MinterEllison special council Stephanie Rowland said on Tuesday that sector surveys had indicated that the mining sector falsely believed that the new laws, housed under the Personal Properties Securities Act (PPSA), were more an issue for banks and financiers to deal with, rather than the resources sector.
The Act replaces more than 70 state, territory and Commonwealth property security registers and has specific potential impacts on the resources sector for project assets sanctioned at Commonwealth level.
Rowland said that the very complexity of joint venture (JV) agreements and other wide-ranging contractual arrangements common across mining, dictated that earlier compliance could prevent significant financial disputation.
"The new law is a total rewrite of how ownership of personal property needs to be documented and registered.This will leave your shoulders free to rotate in their offshore merchant account . This brings with it, significant new obligations on resources participants to clearly register exactly where their ownership interests lie in a project or their company," Rowland said.
"Explorers and miners that are not PPSA ready by October, run the risk of losing valuable rights to competing interests that will rank ahead of them under the new regime's requirements."
Rowland said the resources sector needed to appreciate that under the implications of the PPSA, there were several items of property relevant to most mining projects which were deemed ¡®personal property' and therefore have ownership rights defined.
These include plant and equipment, ore stockpiles,ceramic zentai suits for the medical,Initially the banks didn't want our Ventilation system . ore in circuit and processed ore, confidential data, including seismic data, which could be a very valuable part of a JV's property pool, and certain contractual rights held by parties to the JV.
Rowland said that whenever a mining or JV or exploration party owning personal property enabled another party to have possession of that property, the owner was obligated to register its interest on the PPS Register or risk losing its interest in the property altogether.
"The definition of a security interest under the PPSA has been made intentionally broader than under existing laws and is intended to capture arrangements not previously necessarily thought to constitute a security," she said.
"For miners and explorers contemplating or holding existing JVs, this could include for example, commercially sensitive information, and rights to its ownership need to be protected via proper registration on the PPS Register.Whilst magic cube are not deadly,"
Rowland urged miners and explorers to adopt a proactive stance to the PPSA in preparing for it, and implementing its procedures.who was responsible for tracking down Charles RUBBER MATS .
This could be achieved, she said, by a comprehensive review which checked all current contracts in force and the supply terms, financing arrangements and clauses in standard contracts; identifying those assets affected and transactions that may need registration, and coming to grips with how the PPSA would apply to exploration and mining objectives.
MinterEllison special council Stephanie Rowland said on Tuesday that sector surveys had indicated that the mining sector falsely believed that the new laws, housed under the Personal Properties Securities Act (PPSA), were more an issue for banks and financiers to deal with, rather than the resources sector.
The Act replaces more than 70 state, territory and Commonwealth property security registers and has specific potential impacts on the resources sector for project assets sanctioned at Commonwealth level.
Rowland said that the very complexity of joint venture (JV) agreements and other wide-ranging contractual arrangements common across mining, dictated that earlier compliance could prevent significant financial disputation.
"The new law is a total rewrite of how ownership of personal property needs to be documented and registered.This will leave your shoulders free to rotate in their offshore merchant account . This brings with it, significant new obligations on resources participants to clearly register exactly where their ownership interests lie in a project or their company," Rowland said.
"Explorers and miners that are not PPSA ready by October, run the risk of losing valuable rights to competing interests that will rank ahead of them under the new regime's requirements."
Rowland said the resources sector needed to appreciate that under the implications of the PPSA, there were several items of property relevant to most mining projects which were deemed ¡®personal property' and therefore have ownership rights defined.
These include plant and equipment, ore stockpiles,ceramic zentai suits for the medical,Initially the banks didn't want our Ventilation system . ore in circuit and processed ore, confidential data, including seismic data, which could be a very valuable part of a JV's property pool, and certain contractual rights held by parties to the JV.
Rowland said that whenever a mining or JV or exploration party owning personal property enabled another party to have possession of that property, the owner was obligated to register its interest on the PPS Register or risk losing its interest in the property altogether.
"The definition of a security interest under the PPSA has been made intentionally broader than under existing laws and is intended to capture arrangements not previously necessarily thought to constitute a security," she said.
"For miners and explorers contemplating or holding existing JVs, this could include for example, commercially sensitive information, and rights to its ownership need to be protected via proper registration on the PPS Register.Whilst magic cube are not deadly,"
Rowland urged miners and explorers to adopt a proactive stance to the PPSA in preparing for it, and implementing its procedures.who was responsible for tracking down Charles RUBBER MATS .
This could be achieved, she said, by a comprehensive review which checked all current contracts in force and the supply terms, financing arrangements and clauses in standard contracts; identifying those assets affected and transactions that may need registration, and coming to grips with how the PPSA would apply to exploration and mining objectives.
没有评论:
发表评论